Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, with a score of 83.3 against 83. Galaxy S9's design is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Galaxy S9 counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a superior camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.