Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 83 score against 80.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's design is newer, extremely thinner and much lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with as much storage to install applications and games as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, both have a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and the same internal storage.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much larger sensor, a way more mega-pixels back camera and a way higher video resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.