Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, with an 88.5 score against 83. Galaxy Z Flip is an older device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, but Samsung managed to make it a bit lighter and way thinner anyway. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a just a little greater pixel count in each inch in the display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a lot larger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.