Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, getting an 85.6 score against 83. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is thinner and a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, even though both of them were only released 7 months apart. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10, counting with some extra features and better performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little greater screen density and a little larger screen. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.