Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, having a 92.3 score against 83. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version, so it provides you lots of additional features and a performance increase. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T were released only 5 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot thinner and a little bit lighter.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a little bit bigger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite better pixel quantity per inch of screen. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.