Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 overall score. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is much thinner but much heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and both of them were released with only 7 months difference. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller screen and a way lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4400mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.