Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-18 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Black Shadow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, having a overall score of 91.1 against 83. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's design is incredibly thinner but somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lot lower 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, they both have the same camera aperture. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.