Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 4.0 |
| 2017-11-08 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.02 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite, having a score of 71.5 against 67. Galaxy S III Cricket's body is somewhat lighter but somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S III Cricket has the previous 4.0 version while Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a just a little higher pixel number in each display inch. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite, because although it has 2 less CPU cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite also has a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 64 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with 32 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 3080mAh battery size against 2100mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.