Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-11-08 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.02 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.64 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Y1's 72.1 overall score. IPhone X's body has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Y1, but it is heavier. The iPhone X has a lot better display than Xiaomi Redmi Y1, because it has a way higher resolution of 1125 x 2436, a bit larger screen and a lot higher pixels density.
Apple iPhone X has a greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Y1, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone X counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Y1, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Y1 has just a bit better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 3080mAh of battery capacity. IPhone X counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Y1, because although it has a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Y1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Y1. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Y1, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.