Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 64 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 Lollipop | Android 4.0.3 |
| 2015-07-01 | 2012-04-04 |
| 6.12 x 3.02 x 0.29 inches | 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 4.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 159.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 2 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 7.5 hours talk time |
| 5.2 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC Evo 4G LTE is a bit better than the Xolo Black, getting a 64 score against 58.3. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but HTC Evo 4G LTE has 4.0.3 version while Xolo Black has Android 5.0 Lollipop. Xolo Black features just a bit better screen than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a greater screen pixel density, a larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
Xolo Black features a bit better performance than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more cores and a greater amount of RAM. HTC Evo 4G LTE's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the Xolo Black one, both of them have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB and exactly the same 16 GB internal memory.
Xolo Black features a little bit better camera than HTC Evo 4G LTE, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xolo Black also has a lot higher resolution back camera and faster 30 frames per second video frame rates. The Xolo Black features a really longer battery life than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
The HTC Evo 4G LTE is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.