Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 Lollipop | Android 10 |
| 2015-07-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.12 x 3.02 x 0.29 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is a lot better than Xolo Black's overall score of 58.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Xolo Black has Android 5.0 Lollipop. The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior hardware performance than Xolo Black, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Xolo Black, because it has a bigger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher screen density. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xolo Black, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much better camera than Xolo Black, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution and a way larger diafragm aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments. LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit longer battery life than Xolo Black, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.