Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0 Lollipop | -- |
| 2015-07-01 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.12 x 3.02 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a lot better than Xolo Black, getting an 83.8 score against 58.3. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit superior processor than Xolo Black, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has more RAM. Galaxy A50 features just a bit better screen than Xolo Black, because it has a little greater display density, a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games than Xolo Black, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A50 counts with better battery duration than Xolo Black, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Galaxy A50 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xolo Black, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also has a way better resolution back facing camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Xolo Black, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.