Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-03 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.06 x 2.90 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.99 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a lot better than ZTE Axon, having a global score of 81.1 against 63.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than ZTE Axon. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and ZTE Axon has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
The ZTE Axon and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro have similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a quite lower display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than ZTE Axon, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of 2300 megahertz cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than ZTE Axon, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than ZTE Axon, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.