Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having an 83.3 score against 80.2. The iPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and ZTE Axon 10 Pro comes with Android 10 operating system. Even being the best device in this comparison review, iPhone 11's body is just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
Apple iPhone 11 features just a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a quite worse pixel number in each screen inch, a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a bit smaller display. The Apple iPhone 11 features a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone 11, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features longer battery life than iPhone 11, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 11 is more expensive than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.