Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a score of 85.3 against 80.2. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max body is notably heavier and just a bit thicker than ZTE Axon 10 Pro. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, and ZTE Axon 10 Pro works with Android 10 OS.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM and less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 11 Pro Max has a better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a just a little better screen density and a little bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's battery lifetime is very similar to the ZTE Axon 10 Pro one, although the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a 1% lower battery capacity.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy ZTE Axon 10 Pro, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.