Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is much better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a global score of 92.8 against 80.2. IPhone 12 Pro is a newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it's also a bit heavier. The iPhone 12 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 OS.
IPhone 12 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 12 Pro has a brighter display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a just a little greater count of pixels in each inch of display.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a superior camera than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is way more expensive than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.