Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with a overall score of 87.1 against 80.2. The iPhone 8 Plus is an older and somewhat heavier cellphone than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but Apple managed to build it just a little bit thinner anyway. The iPhone 8 Plus has a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
IPhone 8 Plus has a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has lesser and slower cores and 9 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro takes better videos and photos than iPhone 8 Plus, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a bigger aperture. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a really longer battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 49 percent more battery size.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.