Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 80.2. Although iPhone X is older than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it's design is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter. The iPhone X has just a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels number per display inch and a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone X, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone X counts with a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures better videos and photos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a way more mega-pixels camera and a bigger aperture. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, else you can save some dollars and buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.