Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's 80.2 general score. IPhone XR's construction is a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than ZTE Axon 10 Pro. IPhone XR counts with a bit faster processor than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has 9 GB less RAM and less and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a slightly better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a lot lower 828 x 1792 pixels resolution, a just a bit worse pixels density and a little smaller display. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a back camera with much more MP and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features longer battery life than iPhone XR, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is more expensive than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.