Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's score of 80.2. Even though Apple iPhone XS and ZTE Axon 10 Pro were only released with a couple of months difference, Apple iPhone XS is just a little thinner and just a bit lighter. Apple iPhone XS has a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a just a bit greater pixel density.
The iPhone XS features a bit superior CPU than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much better battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 50% larger battery size. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a better camera than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as ZTE Axon 10 Pro. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone XS, else you can save some money and get the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.