Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3, with a general score of 80.2 against 80. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a somewhat heavier device than the Google Pixel 3, but both are equally thin. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has much more memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 192 GB more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.