Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. Even though the ZTE Axon 10 Pro and the Google Pixel 3a were released with only 0 months difference, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro design is a little thinner but also heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The Google Pixel 3a has a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations, a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.