Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having an 81.9 score against 80.2. The Google Pixel 4 design is a little lighter but a little thicker than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and both were only released with a few months difference. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 has a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a bit greater screen density. ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a lot more MP back facing camera and faster video frame rate.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 4 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.