Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a general score of 82.9 against 80.2. Despite being the best in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also a just a bit thicker and just a little heavier phone. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much more MP back-facing camera.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 192 GB more internal memory. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 4 XL is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.