Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a global score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 general score. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a newer 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. ZTE Axon 10 Pro's body is notably newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 features a more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra graphics co-processor.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures better videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, a lot bigger aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rate. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 224 GB more internal memory.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a very superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One M9. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy ZTE Axon 10 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the HTC One M9, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.