Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a global score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than HTC U11's 77.6 general score. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro construction has the same thickness than the HTC U11, but it's just a bit heavier. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
HTC U11 features a little bit better display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 192 GB more internal storage.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much better camera than HTC U11, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a much higher resolution back camera. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC U11. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC U11, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.