Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a general score of 84.3 against 80.2. LG G8 ThinQ's body is a little lighter but just a bit thicker than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and both were released with only a few months difference. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple additional features.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with just a little better performance than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. ZTE Axon 10 Pro takes much better photos and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit longer battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG G8 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.