Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting an 82.5 score against 80.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and increased performance. LG V30S ThinQ is an older phone than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner anyway.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better screen pixel density. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a better storage to store more games and applications than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 256 GB internal storage.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro takes much better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and higher video frame rate.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as ZTE Axon 10 Pro. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.