Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with an 81.3 score against 80.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older phone than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it is lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 256 GB internal memory. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.