Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with an 81.2 score against 80.2. Both devices in our current comparison include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). LG V40 ThinQ's body is just a little lighter and a bit thinner than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although they were only released with a few months difference.
LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher pixel density. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit better performance than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots a little bit better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more internal storage capacity. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has improved battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.