Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 80.2. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it is a little heavier. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a little better processing power than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM memory.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro and LG Velvet both feature quite similar displays, because although the LG Velvet has a quite lower pixel count per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. LG Velvet captures a bit better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, they both have a 48 MP camera in the back and the same video quality.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG Velvet, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 256 GB internal storage. LG Velvet has a little better battery performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.