Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has an overall score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro's 80.2 score. Although the Motorola One Vision is a better phone than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it must be told that it is also a little thicker and just a bit heavier. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a little better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision has a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a bit better pixels count per screen inch. Motorola One Vision counts with a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a F1.7 aperture.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.