Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having an 87 score against 80.2. The Motorola razr (2020) is a just a little heavier phone than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but they are 0.31inches thick. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple additional features.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit higher pixel number per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little larger display. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has worse video frame rate, they both have a F1.7 aperture, a 48 mega-pixels back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as ZTE Axon 10 Pro. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), else you can save some money and buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.