Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Blue | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's 80.2 overall score. The Nokia XR20 design is noticeably newer than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's, although it is a lot thicker and notably heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Nokia XR20 has newer 11 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Nokia XR20 has just a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures clearer videos and photos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a way higher video quality. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia XR20, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Nokia XR20 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.