Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a general score of 80.2 against 76.2. These phones work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features. ZTE Axon 10 Pro is an older phone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit inferior pixels number per inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a lot better video resolution. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro costs a little more money than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.