Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro's global score of 80.2. Galaxy A50's body is a little bit lighter and a little thinner than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although both of them were released only a couple of months apart. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A50 and ZTE Axon 10 Pro both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50 has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count in each display inch. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same aperture, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A50's battery lifetime is just as good as the ZTE Axon 10 Pro one.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.