Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 80.2. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide the user the same operating system features. The Galaxy A50s is a a bit lighter and a little bit thinner device than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, even when both were released only 5 months apart.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A50s features a display that's very similar to the ZTE Axon 10 Pro one, because although the Galaxy A50s has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s takes a bit better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking images or video in low-light environments and worse 30 fps video frame rates, they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A50s feature incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.