Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting an 85.5 score against 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy A51 design has the same thickness than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's a little lighter. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy A51 features a display that is very similar to the ZTE Axon 10 Pro one, and although the Galaxy A51 has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite greater display pixels density, they both have a same size screen. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy A51, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 captures a bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rates, they both have a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A51's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
The Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.