Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting a 90.8 score against 80.2. The Galaxy Note 20 body is newer, but a little thicker and a bit heavier than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a display that is just as good as ZTE Axon 10 Pro's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a just a little worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite bigger display.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the processor in ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and although the Galaxy Note 20 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better battery life than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 costs a lot more money than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.