Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with a global score of 98.9 against 80.2. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is newer than ZTE Axon 10 Pro's, although it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit faster CPU than ZTE Axon 10 Pro. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a little bit larger display and a little greater pixel amount per inch of display.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.