Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Blue | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting a overall score of 83 against 80.2. Even being the best we are comparing here, Galaxy Note8 is an older, a little bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a better screen density. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has better video frame rate and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Note8 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.