Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with a 98 score against 80.2. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is newer than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a greater screen pixels density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and ZTE Axon 10 Pro have incredibly similar CPUs, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 108 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has better battery performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.