Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's 80.2 score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction is newer, a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, providing the user a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a way better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a little greater pixels density. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM.
Galaxy S22 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking images in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a more MP camera. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has an 8% larger battery size.
The Galaxy S22 costs more money than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.