Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting a general score of 95.4 against 80.2. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, so it provides you a lot of extra features and better performance. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot newer than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it's way heavier and somewhat thicker.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a greater screen density and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with greater battery performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.