Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.28 ounces | -- |
| Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting an 82.6 score against 80.2. Galaxy S25 is a incredibly thinner and extremely lighter phone than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy S25 has a better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM. The Galaxy S25 takes better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S25's battery life is very similar to the battery lifetime in ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is more expensive than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as ZTE Axon 10 Pro. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save some money and get the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.