Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with an 83.3 score against 80.2. The Galaxy S9 is an older and a little bit thicker phone than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit lighter anyway. The Galaxy S9 counts with a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S9, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features superior battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.