Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting an 81 score against 80.2. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has the newer 11 version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you a couple additional features. Even being the best we are comparing here, the Galaxy XCover Pro is an extremely thicker and heavier phone than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a screen that's just as good as ZTE Axon 10 Pro's display, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.