Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having an 88.5 score against 80.2. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip is just a little bit heavier than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's processor is just as good as the ZTE Axon 10 Pro one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a little higher pixels density, a little larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent larger battery capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a bigger camera aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as ZTE Axon 10 Pro. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.