Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blue | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a general score of 82.9 against 80.2. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has the newer 9.0 Pie version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features. Although it's the best device we are comparing here, Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's construction is heavier and somewhat thicker than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a little bit better screen pixels density. ZTE Axon 10 Pro and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro feature very similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro takes slightly better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.