Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a global score of 81.1 against 80.2. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 OS. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is newer than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it's heavier and thicker. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has superior battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.